Some have said that the Nazi-Soviet Pact was the single most important reason for the start of the Second World War. Would you agree with this judgement? Explain your answer.
Reasons for and Against.
Appeasment
I agree with this to some extent, because starlin knew that germany was going to invade he thought that if he singned the agreament he could prospone war.Also the lack of trust between nations played a factor in the start of war.Starlin singed the pact with Germany because it benfitted him and the fact that germany offerd him controll of blatic nations, and the fact that britian kept delaying negoations.and basically germany was more powerful than britian also starlin feared an invasion from germany so Stalin believed the best way to of dealing with Germany was to form an alliance.the fact that chamberlian and starlin didnt trust each other,starlin belived that chamberlian would trick russia into fighting a war with germany on its on.Chamberlian belived that starlins views were in the best intrests of himself.
in conclusion i think the nazi soviet pact was and important factor for the start of a war.but many other thing's played a vitale role the lack of trust between nations and that starlin and chamberlain didn't trust each other caused promblems because this stoped biritan and russia forming an alliance what may of stopped some of hitlers actions if the pact wasn's agread i still think that war would of broke out sooner or later as it was in inevitable hitler was always going to do what he wanted
a) Neville Chamberlain has been accused of being directly responsible for the Second World War. Would you agree that he is guilty of this?
#Reasons for not being guilty.
#Reasons for being guilty.
#Conclusion.
I think that he is not fully responsible for world war 2. I think this because Hitler did sign some contracts saying that he will not invade anymore countrys if Neville Chamblen gave him these. This was called appeasment Neville Chamblen was constently appeasing Hitler. Hitler thought that Chamblen was to scared to do anything so he kept on taking more countrys. He was going to take Poland but Britain and France said, hold on a minute we have gave you alot of land if you take Poland we will declair war on you.
On the other hand Neville Chamblen was guilty to partly starting the war. This is because he just kept on appesing him he sould of just stop when he frist asked for land.
chamberlian belived that appeasing hitler was the best way to deal with things at the time but chamberlian knew that appeasing was like feeding a crocadile a piece of meat knowing fine well that you are going to be the last thing it eats.appeasment has never worked and it can only be used in the short term chamberlian knew this but the reason why he kept appeasing hitler was because he was to scared to fight a war.also chamberlian claimed that he had hitlers word that he would not invade anymore countries that turned out to be a lie and chamberlian should of knowing that he could not trust hitler.the fact that chamberlian didn't stand up to hitler may of encouraged hitler to go as this was a sign of weakness
in conclusion i think that chamberlain is to blame for the start of the war to some extent because hitler was a man who was going to do what ever he wanted anyway the fact that chamberlian appeased hitler showed weakness on chamberlains behalf and also may of encourged hitler to go on demanding land and taking over countries.appeasement showed that chamberlain was to scared to fight another war and the fact that britians army was weakend by the war did not help matters.on the otherhand chamberlain belived appeasing hitler was in the best intrests of the people they had just fought a war 20 years earlier and many people didnt want to go through another war agian.also britians army was weakend by the war appeasing hitler could prospone the war giving them time to rearm.chamberlain belived that if he kept appeasing hitler he may go away after a while
Comments [0]